A performance marketing manager at a 20-person e-commerce company sits down to pull channel attribution data and realizes that every tool capable of doing the analysis properly — cohort breakdowns, multi-touch attribution, affiliate network reconciliation — is priced assuming a dedicated analytics engineer and a six-figure software budget. The moment they realize they have a real problem is when they open a renewal quote and see that the next feature tier costs more than their entire current marketing stack.

The gap persists for a structural reason: the companies building enterprise analytics tools sell to enterprise procurement teams, not to the marketing managers who actually use the software daily. The buyer and the user are different people. The enterprise buyer cares about compliance, vendor reputation, and contract terms. The small-business user cares about whether they can export to CSV without upgrading. When complaints come in about price, they come from users who don't control the buying decision — so the vendor's sales team never feels pressure to build a cheaper tier that actually works.

Users say things like 'the subscription could be more cost efficient as companies see the price and immediately begin to look for alternative sources like Excel' and 'the learning curve is huge and it is rather expensive for small businesses.' The Excel escape hatch is the tell: when users defect to a spreadsheet, it means the tool is overbuilt for their use case, not that they don't need the data.

This is a business because the need to understand channel and affiliate performance doesn't go away — it grows as the company acquires more traffic sources. A small team that can't afford enterprise attribution is still running paid social, affiliate programs, and email simultaneously, and they're making budget allocation decisions on gut feel because the data is locked behind a pricing tier they can't reach. That misspent ad budget is the concrete cost of the gap.

What to build

Build a web-based affiliate and multi-channel attribution reporting tool capped intentionally at the feature set a 10–50 person marketing team actually uses — cohort reports, affiliate network reconciliation, and CSV export — priced at a flat $99–$299/month with no traffic-volume overages.

Where to start

Lead with affiliate network reconciliation — matching payouts from networks like ShareASale or Impact against actual conversions — because this specific workflow is genuinely underserved at sub-enterprise price points and gives a clear, immediate dollar value to the first user who tries it.

The hard part

The hardest early trade-off is resisting feature creep: the moment you add a feature to compete upmarket, your pricing model breaks and you're building a worse version of the incumbents rather than a meaningfully simpler one — staying narrow requires turning down customer requests that would each individually seem reasonable.

How it makes money

Flat monthly subscription at three tiers by number of affiliate partners tracked ($99, $199, $299), with no traffic-volume component — the absence of volume pricing is itself a selling point against incumbents.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Digital Analytics.

More ideas in Digital Analytics