HR directors at mid-market companies frequently admit they're paying for ADP and don't know what they're actually using. One complaint puts it plainly: 'I do not believe we are utilizing the system to its full capability.' This isn't ignorance — it's a structural information problem. ADP is vast, changes constantly, and the people who bought it (often a CFO or COO during a procurement cycle) are not the people who use it daily. The daily users learned the system once, built their workflows around what they found, and never went back.

ADP has no incentive to proactively surface underused features in a way that might lead a client to question their tier or switch to a cheaper configuration. Their account managers upsell; they don't audit. The result is that HR teams are either overpaying for modules they don't touch, or manually doing work in spreadsheets that ADP already supports — because nobody told them and they didn't go looking.

The gap is an independent, honest audit of what a specific ADP tenant has licensed versus what's actually being used, mapped to the workflows the HR team currently handles manually or outside the system. This isn't a feature tour — it's a gap analysis with a concrete remediation list: 'You have performance management licensed and nobody has logged into it in 14 months' or 'You're running open enrollment in a spreadsheet but your ADP tier includes it.'

This is a business and not a one-time consulting project because ADP's feature set changes, companies' needs change, and the people who run HR at mid-market companies turn over. The audit needs to happen on a recurring basis — at minimum annually, practically every time there's a new HR director or a contract renewal.

What to build

Build a structured audit workflow — combining read access to a client's ADP tenant configuration and usage logs with a standardized HR process inventory questionnaire — that produces a written gap report mapping licensed-but-unused ADP modules to processes the team currently handles outside the system, delivered as a repeatable annual engagement.

Where to start

Target companies 6–12 months before their ADP contract renewal, when HR directors are actively asking 'are we getting value from this?' — partner with HR-focused CFO advisors or benefits brokers who already have relationships at that decision moment.

The hard part

The first sale requires convincing an HR director to let an outside party read their ADP configuration, which involves IT and legal sign-off at some companies — the sales cycle is longer than the audit itself, so getting the first five reference customers will take disproportionate effort.

How it makes money

Fixed fee per audit engagement ($2,500–5,000 depending on company size), with an optional recurring monitoring retainer ($500/month) that tracks feature adoption against the remediation plan and flags new ADP capabilities added since the last audit.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Core HR.

More ideas in Core HR