When an employee sits down to make benefit elections, they're looking at a list of plan options with no plain-language explanation of what each covers, why it costs what it costs, or what they should pick given their situation. HR at a 200-person company has already spent weeks configuring rates and eligibility rules. Nobody had time to write the decision guide. The result is exactly what users describe: enrollment feels 'confusing and overwhelming, especially during annual renewal,' and employees make elections they don't understand.

The Core HR vendor has no incentive to fix this because they sell to HR buyers, not employees. The HR buyer evaluates the system on configuration capability, not on whether a 27-year-old can figure out if they should pick the HDHP. So the enrollment UI gets built for compliance and completeness, not comprehension. This structural misalignment between who buys and who uses is exactly why this has stayed broken across ADP's entire product line.

What HR teams actually need is a way to produce a plain-language enrollment walkthrough — specific to their company's actual plans, with the actual rates and employer contribution amounts — that employees can follow alongside (or instead of) the HR system's enrollment screen. The complaints specifically call out 'customizable steps' and note that confusion is worse for companies with 'unique plans.' Generic benefits literacy content doesn't solve this because it can't reference the specific plan names, deduction amounts, or enrollment deadlines in that employer's system.

This recurs every year at open enrollment, every time a new employee is hired, and every time a qualifying life event triggers a re-enrollment window. HR teams at small-to-mid-size companies don't have a benefits communications team to produce this material. They're rebuilding a rough PDF guide from scratch every year.

What to build

Build a web tool where an HR admin uploads or manually enters their company's benefit plan options, rates, and employer contribution structure, and the tool generates a step-by-step enrollment walkthrough — with plain-language plan summaries and a simple decision tree — that employees open on their phone or laptop alongside the actual enrollment system.

Where to start

Start with companies that have at least one non-traditional benefit (commuter, HRA, supplemental life) that employees consistently mis-enroll in — these companies feel the pain most acutely and have the clearest before/after story to share with peers.

The hard part

Plan data comes in inconsistent formats — some clients will upload a carrier rate sheet PDF, others will type it in manually, and the tool has to produce something accurate and useful without a lengthy setup process, or it becomes yet another thing HR doesn't have time to do.

How it makes money

Flat annual fee per company, tiered by employee count. The natural renewal trigger is open enrollment season, so churn is naturally low — you re-engage every client at the moment they need it most.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Core HR.

More ideas in Core HR