The moment that sends someone looking for this is when they finish editing a photo, then spend fifteen minutes clicking through menus trying to get a 2MB JPEG for a client email while also saving a print-quality TIFF for the printer — and still aren't sure the output is right. They're solving a logistics problem with a creative tool, and the creative tool has no interest in making logistics clean.
Adobe's incentive here is real: keeping export complex inside Photoshop gives power users a reason to stay in the app and rewards people who learn the hard way. Simplifying it would commoditize the output step. So Adobe adds 'Export As' menus and removes the quality slider, which makes things worse for working photographers and designers who need exact byte-count control — exactly what the complaints describe.
What's actually missing isn't just a simpler UI. It's a way to define a named preset — 'Instagram post', 'client PDF under 5MB', 'print at 300dpi' — and apply it to any image from any source in one step, with a live file size preview before committing. The complaint 'I am still trying to figure out the best way to export final work for different platforms' repeats across every product in this category because the knowledge is tacit and non-transferable: you figure it out in Photoshop and then have to figure it out again in Lightroom.
This is a business because it recurs every time a deliverable changes destination. A wedding photographer exports differently for the couple's album, the wedding website, the print lab, and their own portfolio. That's four export decisions per job, and they repeat across hundreds of jobs. The cost isn't just time — it's misfiled deliverables, client revision requests because the PDF was too large to email, or print jobs rejected for wrong DPI. None of that is dramatic enough to make Adobe fix it, but it's expensive enough that someone will pay a small recurring fee to stop experiencing it.
What to build
Build a desktop app that sits outside Adobe products, watches a source folder for finished images, and applies named export presets — each storing format, quality, exact pixel dimensions or DPI, and a max file size ceiling — then writes outputs to destination folders, with a live file size estimate shown before the export runs.
Where to start
Start with wedding and portrait photographers who already maintain folder-based delivery workflows and can describe their exact preset needs out loud — they're the cohort most likely to pay immediately and to recommend the tool to their photography communities.
The hard part
Getting accurate pre-export file size estimates for JPEG is genuinely hard because JPEG compression interacts with image content — a preset that hits 2MB on one photo hits 4MB on another with more detail, so the 'max file size' promise requires dynamic quality adjustment logic, not just a fixed slider value.
How it makes money
Flat monthly subscription per seat, around $9–$15/month, with a free tier limited to three saved presets to drive word-of-mouth before hitting the paywall.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Photo Editing.
More ideas in Photo Editing