The complaint is blunt: Photoshop Express 'doesn't have the ability to work with chroma key images or remove the background from images.' Affinity Photo users note the missing masking and cloning tools. What these users are describing is a specific studio workflow: shoot against a green screen or plain backdrop, pull a clean key, drop in a replacement background, and deliver. This is bread-and-butter work for product photographers, headshot photographers, and e-commerce teams.
This gap persists for a structural reason: chroma keying is primarily a video editing concept. Still photography tools borrowed subject masking from video pipelines, but they've optimized for the 'remove background' AI use case — which works on clean subjects against neutral backgrounds — not for the precise, tunable keying workflow that handles hair, translucency, and color spill that studio photographers actually need. The AI background removers handle the easy case. The hard case — fine hair against a slightly uneven green screen, translucent fabric, motion blur at edges — still requires manual masking work that takes 20–30 minutes per image.
Studio photographers who shoot on green screens and submit to stock agencies or e-commerce clients do this for hundreds of images per week. They currently either use video tools (awkward for stills workflows, wrong file formats, no batch processing for raw files) or spend manual masking time in Photoshop. Neither is a clean fit.
The business case is that e-commerce product photography studios have high volume and predictable repeat need. A tool built specifically around still-photo chroma keying — with proper spill suppression, batch processing of raw or TIFF files, and direct export to layered PSD or transparent PNG — would replace a multi-tool kludge that currently costs studios 10–15 hours of labor per week.
What to build
Build a desktop application for Mac and Windows that ingests raw or TIFF still photos shot against a green or blue screen, applies tunable chroma key extraction with spill suppression and edge refinement controls, supports batch processing of full shoots, and exports transparent-background PNG or layered PSD files.
Where to start
Start with apparel e-commerce studios specifically — fabric translucency and hair make AI background removal fail visibly, the volume is high (hundreds of SKUs per week), and the client-facing quality bar is explicit, making the ROI of a better tool easy to quantify.
The hard part
The AI background removal market has conditioned buyers to expect this to be a commodity or even free — you need to demonstrate the quality gap on difficult subjects (hair, translucency, spill) clearly enough that studios understand they're buying a precision tool, not a faster version of what's already free.
How it makes money
Per-seat monthly subscription ($39–79/month) with volume pricing for studios running multiple operator seats, since the need is continuous and tied to shoot volume.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Photo Editing.
More ideas in Photo Editing