The moment someone needs to convert files regularly — MTS footage from a camcorder, MXF files from a broadcast camera, DVD rips on a Mac — they search, download the first result, hit a paywall mid-workflow, and have to start over. This happens constantly, and not because the information doesn't exist somewhere, but because it's scattered across review sites that don't distinguish between free-tier capability and paid-tier capability. Review aggregators list features as if the product offers them, not as if only the $49/year version offers them.
The incumbents in review aggregation have no incentive to publish granular tier-by-tier breakdowns. Their revenue comes from affiliate clicks and license sales — a thorough 'this feature requires the paid version' disclosure actively hurts conversion. So the comparison stays blurry on purpose.
What's missing is a searchable reference where someone can filter by format (input and output), by operating system, by whether a specific feature — trimming, batch conversion, metadata editing, hardware acceleration — is available in the free tier versus paid. Users specifically called out not knowing that trimmers and stabilizers were paywalled, or that a 'free' listing meant free-to-download-but-$14-to-use. A trustworthy index of exactly what each tier does and doesn't do, verified by actually testing the software, would let someone make a decision before they've wasted an afternoon.
This is a business and not a feature because the file converter market moves constantly — new versions lock or unlock features, pricing changes, new apps appear. The index requires ongoing maintenance, which creates a subscription relationship with the users who depend on it most: IT support staff who field 'why can't I export this?' tickets, small video production teams choosing tools for a new project, and power users who switch formats frequently enough that the wrong tool choice costs real hours.
What to build
Build a searchable, human-verified database of file converter software where every listed feature is tagged to the specific pricing tier that unlocks it, updated on a rolling quarterly review cycle, with filters for input format, output format, OS, and free-tier capability.
Where to start
Start with MTS, MXF, and DVD formats specifically — these are niche enough that existing review sites have thin, low-quality coverage, but they're the exact formats that generate the most 'I didn't know this was paywalled' complaints from prosumer camera users.
The hard part
Keeping the tier data accurate requires actually running each tool version by version — this is manual, doesn't scale cheaply, and a single outdated entry erodes the trust the whole product depends on.
How it makes money
Free access to basic tier breakdowns; $9/month for saved comparisons, format-specific alerts when pricing or feature tiers change, and API access for IT buyers who want to embed the data in internal procurement tooling.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in File Converter.
More ideas in File Converter