Employees describe the enrollment experience as 'guessing when signing up to invest' and say the site offers 'limited information and guidance about the 401k process.' This isn't a training problem or a financial literacy problem in the abstract — it's that when a new hire sits down to enroll, they land on a separate portal with no context, no explanation of what their employer's match formula actually means in dollar terms, and no nudge to take any specific action.

The gap exists because the HR team who configured the plan in ADP doesn't have a way to attach plain-language employer-specific context to the enrollment portal. The 401k vendor's generic enrollment flow is built for compliance, not comprehension. And the HR director who would want employees to actually use the benefit fully has no tool to bridge the two — they'd have to manually write a PDF and email it separately, which most never do.

The result is chronic under-enrollment and under-contribution, which means employers are leaving match budget on the table (they budgeted for a certain match percentage and employees don't hit the threshold to collect it), and employees are leaving free money behind. Neither party has a clean way to see this happening.

This is a business and not a feature because every new hire triggers the same broken onboarding experience, and every open enrollment period resets it. A company adding 50 people a year has 50 new opportunities to lose an employee to a competitor who explains their benefits more clearly. The HR director feels this as turnover and disengagement, not as a 401k admin problem — which means they'll pay for something that fixes the employee experience, not just the admin experience.

What to build

Build an embeddable enrollment guide that HR admins configure once with their specific employer match formula, vesting schedule, and fund options — expressed in plain dollars-and-cents examples — and that employees access via a single link in their onboarding email, showing them exactly what they need to contribute to capture the full employer match, with a direct handoff link to the ADP or third-party enrollment portal.

Where to start

Target companies that recently switched 401k providers and are re-enrolling their entire workforce — that's a forcing event where the HR manager already knows the existing materials are outdated and is actively looking for something better before the re-enrollment window opens.

The hard part

HR buyers will ask why this isn't just a page in their existing HRIS or benefits admin tool, and the honest answer is that those tools technically could do it but never prioritized it — so you have to win on execution and simplicity, not on a capability nobody else has, which means the sales conversation is harder.

How it makes money

Flat annual fee per company, tiered by employee count — small companies pay $1,500–3,000/year, larger ones more. No per-seat pricing since the HR admin is the only configurator and the employee-facing guide is the deliverable.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Core HR.

More ideas in Core HR