The triggering moment: a development team has stood up an API gateway, made their best guesses on authentication settings, CORS policy, and rate limiting, and now needs to ship — but nobody on the team has the background to know whether what they've configured is actually secure. They know they don't know. They're shipping anyway.
This gap exists because API security is genuinely specialized, and the teams most exposed to risk are precisely the ones that can't afford a dedicated API security engineer. Hiring a consultant is expensive and slow. Asking the gateway vendor's support team gets you documentation links, not configuration reviews. The vendors themselves have no incentive to tell you your config is wrong — that's a support liability.
The complaints here are specific: users describe needing 'time to understand API security concepts, policy design, and how to write effective checks' and finding that 'users without coding experience find it steep to create effective custom tests.' What's missing isn't more documentation — it's an external, opinionated eye that says 'this specific setting on your current config is a problem, here's why, here's how to fix it.' That verdict doesn't exist anywhere in official tooling because it requires taking a position, and vendors won't.
This is a business and not a feature because every new API surface, every new environment, and every significant configuration change creates a new review need. Companies release new APIs regularly. Each release is a recurring trigger. The alternative — either ignoring security review entirely or paying a consultant — costs either unquantified risk or significant hourly fees. A team that uses this once for their payment API will return when they launch their partner API, their internal tooling API, and their mobile backend.
What to build
Build a CLI tool and web interface that ingests an exported API gateway configuration (starting with Amazon API Gateway and Apigee export formats), runs it against a curated ruleset of common API security misconfigurations, and produces a prioritized findings report with specific line-level fix instructions — no agent install, no traffic inspection required.
Where to start
Lead with a free, no-signup configuration scanner for Amazon API Gateway specifically — the IAM policy complexity complaints are loudest here, the export format is well-documented, and a free scan creates a natural upsell to paid continuous monitoring when teams realize the problem recurs on every deploy.
The hard part
The ruleset has to be opinionated enough to be useful but accurate enough that false positives don't erode trust — one wrongly flagged 'critical' issue on a correctly configured policy and the team stops listening to everything else the tool says.
How it makes money
Free for one-time scans; monthly subscription for continuous scanning tied to CI/CD pipeline, priced per gateway environment.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in API Management.
More ideas in API Management