The moment this becomes a real problem: an instructor finishes running the same course they taught last term, opens their video conferencing tool to export attendance, and discovers the download is a raw CSV with inconsistent timestamps, no session-to-session comparison, and no way to match attendees across multiple class meetings. They spend an hour in a spreadsheet doing what should take two clicks.
This gap persists because video conferencing vendors sell to IT buyers and meeting schedulers — not to instructors or training coordinators. The people who feel the attendance pain most acutely are rarely the ones who signed the contract, so their complaints go into a feedback forum and die there. Adding robust LMS-style attendance tracking would also cannibalize the vendors' integrations with actual LMSes, so there's a structural reason they leave it thin.
What the current situation forces people to do: manually export per-session CSVs, reconcile them in Excel or Google Sheets, and then hand-build a per-student attendance record across a term. For a professor running four sections of the same course, this is a multi-hour recurring task every semester. For a corporate trainer tracking compliance attendance, missing or messy records carry real liability risk.
This is a business and not a feature because the need recurs on a fixed schedule — every course cohort, every quarter, every compliance cycle. The buyer is a training manager or academic department head who already pays for tools that almost solve this, which means they have budget and motivation. They don't need another conferencing tool; they need the reporting layer that sits on top of the one they already use.
What to build
Build a web app that connects to Adobe Connect, Chime, and similar conferencing APIs, pulls raw attendance events per session, and produces per-student attendance summaries across a defined course or event series — with CSV and PDF export formatted for direct submission to an LMS gradebook or HR compliance record.
Where to start
Start with Adobe Connect specifically, which has a documented API and a disproportionate share of university and government training users who already feel this pain acutely and have procurement processes that reward solving compliance-adjacent problems.
The hard part
API access to attendee-level join/leave events varies wildly across conferencing vendors — some expose it cleanly, others require polling or webhook gymnastics — so the first painful trade-off is deciding how many integrations you build before you have a paying customer, versus launching with one vendor and being too narrow to sell.
How it makes money
Annual subscription per organization, tiered by number of active hosts — roughly $200–600/year for small academic departments, more for enterprise training teams with compliance requirements.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Video Conferencing.
More ideas in Video Conferencing