There is a specific job that nobody has a good system for: managing open support tickets across multiple enterprise software vendors simultaneously, tracking whether each one is actually progressing, and knowing when to escalate, who to escalate to, and what documentation to attach. At any mid-to-large company, the team managing analytics software is also managing data warehouse tickets, tag management tickets, CDP tickets, and more — all tracked in separate vendor portals, with no unified view of what's stuck.
The users complaining that 'it can take time to find the right person to speak with' and that 'customer support is very low, takes forever to get in contact with someone' are not just describing slow vendors — they're describing the hidden labor of managing vendor relationships at scale. That labor falls on individual analysts or IT ops people who maintain it in a spreadsheet or their personal email.
This gap persists because enterprise software buyers and users are different people. The IT director who negotiates the contract cares about uptime SLAs; the analyst who actually files tickets cares about getting unblocked this afternoon. Neither has a structured way to surface the pattern of slow support up the chain, so the vendor never faces consequences for it — and the analyst just absorbs the friction.
What's missing is a lightweight system that connects to vendor portals via email parsing or API, tracks open ticket age against contractual SLAs, flags tickets that have gone silent for more than X hours, generates a weekly summary of stuck issues for managers, and stores a contact map of who at each vendor actually resolves issues (not just who the account manager is). This is a business because the cost is not just analyst time — it's business decisions that get delayed while data pipelines are broken, and executives who need to understand whether a vendor relationship is worth renewing have no structured data to make that call.
What to build
Build a dashboard that ingests support ticket data from enterprise vendor portals via email forwarding or API, tracks open ticket age against each vendor's contracted SLA, surfaces tickets that have gone silent for more than 24 hours, and generates a weekly digest for managers showing which vendors are consistently missing response targets.
Where to start
Start with companies that already use a single email alias to manage all vendor support communication (a common practice in IT ops), since those customers can wire up the email parsing integration in minutes and see value within the first week without changing any behavior.
The hard part
Getting ticket data out of vendor portals is messy — most don't have clean APIs, which means you rely on email parsing or users manually forwarding ticket threads, which creates enough friction to kill adoption before the product proves its value.
How it makes money
Flat monthly fee per organization — $300-800/month depending on number of vendor integrations tracked — with a 30-day free trial that requires no integration, just CSV upload of open tickets, to prove the concept before asking for email access.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Digital Analytics.
More ideas in Digital Analytics