When an engineer at a European manufacturer runs a structural analysis and needs material properties for a stainless steel grade defined under EN 10088 or a fastener material under DIN 267, the CAE library typically has AISI equivalents at best — or nothing at all. The complaint that tools should 'add material properties with respect to all international standards' comes up across multiple CAE products, and it's not an oversight: it's a product localization problem that no vendor has solved because their core development teams are US- or Germany-centric and the standards landscape is genuinely fragmented across ASTM, ISO, JIS, GB, EN, and GOST.

This matters more than it sounds. Materials aren't freely interchangeable across standards even when they're chemically similar — yield strength, elongation at break, and temperature ratings differ between standards-grade specifications. An engineer substituting an ASTM equivalent risks being wrong in ways that only surface at certification review. So they either build the property set from scratch using the actual standard document (expensive and slow) or they use a close-enough substitute and document the assumption (a compliance risk).

Existing materials databases index by chemistry or trade name, not by standard designation and grade. A buyer searching for '1.4301 per EN 10088-3 with mechanical properties at 200°C' gets no useful result and falls back to PDF hunting.

This is a recurring business need — not a one-time reference lookup — because manufacturers run new simulations constantly, standards get revised, and product lines expand into new geographic markets with different certification requirements. The engineering manager who needs to certify parts for both North American and European customers has this problem on every project.

What to build

Build a material properties lookup service indexed by international standard designation and grade (EN, JIS, GB, GOST, ISO, ASTM) that returns verified mechanical, thermal, and fatigue properties exportable as Ansys Engineering Data XML or LS-DYNA keyword input, with traceability to the specific standard version cited.

Where to start

Start with EN-standard stainless and structural steels for European automotive and industrial equipment suppliers — a narrow enough slice that the data set is manageable, but a market where the gap causes real certification friction and the buyer can justify cost immediately.

The hard part

Standards bodies charge licensing fees for the actual documents, and reproducing property tables from them raises IP questions that require either licensing agreements or careful legal structuring around what constitutes a derived work versus a lookup reference.

How it makes money

Annual subscription per engineering seat, tiered by number of standard families covered — starts with one regional standard set (e.g., EN metals) and expands to JIS or GB as an upsell.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Simulation & CAE.

More ideas in Simulation & CAE