The moment this becomes a problem is when someone is about to start a new project — a product launch, a client onboarding, a content calendar — and opens their project tool to a blank slate. They know roughly what the project involves, but building the full task structure from scratch takes 30-45 minutes they don't have, and the generic templates in the tool don't match their specific context or industry.

Collaboration tools ship generic templates because they serve a broad market and can't invest in deep vertical specificity for every use case. The template library is a marketing feature — it lowers signup friction — not a core workflow investment. So templates stay broad, static, and rarely updated. The user who wants a template for 'B2B SaaS product launch with a 6-person team and a 90-day timeline' gets a generic 'Product Launch' board with 8 tasks and has to rebuild it anyway.

The specific complaint from users is plain: they want something that takes their given information and generates a template that actually fits their situation. That's not a template library problem — it's a generation problem. A library of 500 templates still requires the user to find, evaluate, and customize. Generation skips all of that.

This is a business because it sits outside any single collaboration tool. Someone building a construction firm's project structure shouldn't have to hope that Any.do's template team thought of them. A generation layer that understands project context — industry, team size, timeline, deliverables — and outputs a structured task list that can be imported into whichever tool the team uses recurs every time a new project starts, which for most teams is monthly or more frequently.

What to build

Build a web app where a user describes their project in plain language — industry, goal, team size, timeline, key deliverables — and receives a structured task hierarchy they can export as a CSV, JSON, or direct API import into AITable, Any.do, or Allo, with tasks grouped by phase and pre-populated with realistic durations and dependencies.

Where to start

Target creative and marketing agencies first — they start new client projects constantly, have highly repetitive project structures (briefs, drafts, reviews, approvals), and are already frustrated with generic templates; word of mouth inside agency networks travels fast.

The hard part

The output quality needs to be immediately usable, not a starting point for another 20 minutes of editing — if users have to heavily rework the generated template, the value proposition collapses, and you're back to being a slightly fancier blank slate.

How it makes money

Free for up to 3 project template generations per month, then $12/month per user for unlimited generations and saved templates; team plans at $8/seat/month with shared template libraries.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Project Collaboration.

More ideas in Project Collaboration