Motor designers using tools like Motor-CAD hit a specific, recurring wall at the point where they need to hand off results: the tool won't export high-definition FEA figures, and it doesn't support user-defined asymmetric rotor designs in ways that would make those figures meaningful for custom work. The complaint is explicit — 'lacks support for user-defined asymmetric rotor designs and high definition FEA figure export' — and it creates a manual bottleneck that happens on every design cycle, not just occasionally.
This gap exists because motor design tools are built primarily for electromagnetic and thermal analysis, and the figure export and geometry customization features are treated as secondary. The buyer is often an engineering manager who evaluates the tool on accuracy and speed; the person actually screaming about export quality is a junior engineer preparing a report at 10pm before a customer presentation. That disconnect means the complaint never rises loudly enough in product feedback to get prioritized.
What engineers end up doing is screenshotting low-res outputs, manually annotating them in PowerPoint, or rebuilding the geometry in a general FEA tool just to get a publishable figure — which means re-entering data, re-running partial analyses, and hoping nothing changed. This is a workflow that repeats with every design iteration and every customer deliverable.
A focused tool that accepts motor geometry and FEA output data, renders publication-quality figures with controllable resolution and annotation, and handles asymmetric rotor geometry without requiring the user to go back to a general FEA environment would remove a task that currently takes hours and adds no engineering value. It's unglamorous work, which is exactly why nobody has built it — and exactly why the engineer doing it every week would pay for something that makes it take ten minutes.
What to build
Build a rendering and figure export tool that ingests FEA result data from motor design software exports, supports asymmetric rotor geometry definitions, and outputs annotated, publication-resolution figures in configurable formats without requiring the user to re-run any analysis.
Where to start
Target EV motor startups that are iterating fast and delivering customer reports weekly — they feel the export pain on every cycle and are less locked into large-enterprise procurement processes than Tier 1 suppliers.
The hard part
Getting access to enough real FEA output formats from motor design tools to build reliable importers — the data formats are poorly documented and vary by tool version, meaning the first few customers will require hands-on onboarding to get clean imports working.
How it makes money
Per-seat annual license with a one-time setup fee for custom format integration; natural expansion into team report templating once the core export workflow is established.
See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Simulation & CAE.
More ideas in Simulation & CAE