The moment someone realizes they have this problem is when they've picked a template they like, then discovered they can't move a text block, change the font, or remove a logo without upgrading — or that the animation they saw in the demo simply doesn't exist in the version they're actually using. They end up with two browser tabs open: the presentation tool and Canva, copying elements back and forth.

This gap persists because the vendors building these tools make money from upgrade friction. Locking animation, interactivity, and layout control behind premium tiers isn't an oversight — it's the business model. So the free and mid-tier user is structurally underserved by design, not by accident. Nobody inside those companies is incentivized to fix it for the segment that isn't paying.

What users specifically want isn't a more powerful all-in-one product — they want templates that behave like editable documents, not locked images. 'Lacks cut and paste' and 'limited options for customization' aren't complaints about missing AI features; they're complaints about basic editing dignity. The gap is a library of presentation and video slide templates where every element — layout, animation timing, color, interactivity triggers — is exposed for editing without a paywall, and the templates are built to work across export formats users already use.

This is a business and not a feature because the template library needs ongoing curation — new templates added for trends, industries, and formats — and because individual creators, small teams, and educators return every time they start a new project. It's a recurring creative supply problem, not a one-time purchase.

What to build

Build a searchable library of fully unlocked presentation and video slide templates — every layer, animation, and interactive element editable without a tier restriction — exportable to standard formats, with new templates added weekly by a small in-house design team.

Where to start

Start with educators and course creators who produce slideshow-style video content regularly and are the most vocal about being forced into Canva as a second tool — they have a clear recurring need and talk to each other in tight communities.

The hard part

The hardest thing is avoiding the same trap the incumbents fell into: the moment you need revenue, the temptation is to lock advanced templates behind a tier, which is exactly what users are fleeing from — so the pricing model has to be flat and credible from day one.

How it makes money

Flat monthly subscription for full library access, around $12–18/month, with a permanently free tier that includes a rotating set of 20 templates with no locked elements — no feature gating, only breadth gating.

See the evidence. The complaints behind this idea, the products they came from, and similar ideas in Presentation.

More ideas in Presentation